I am frustrated by what I perceive to be a lack of depth in the coverage and analysis of the New Haven Firefighters discrimination case. What exactly was the promotion test, i.e. what was the nature of the questions on the exam? How many? What subject areas? How could such a test be constructed in a biased way if that were indeed the test designer's intent? Was this explained somewhere in the overall media coverage and I just missed it, or was it lacking? As people read about the case, and applaud or decry the decision, these questions seem relevant for ascertaining whether "justice" was served. I did a brief Google search and got more of "What, Who, Why, When, and Where", but just the same stuff. Still in the dark as to how someone could construct a biased test if that were their agenda. Anybody else feel this way?
Tags: discrimination, firefighters